• dom. Dic 5th, 2021

Thogden & Thogdad Rank Every 2021/22 Premier League Home Kit from Best to Worst.

↓Open for links↓

►Business Enquiries: thogden.pr@gmail.com

Camisetas Hungría maillot de foot personnalisé

  1. I'm confused as to why there's a VHS effect when showing the kits. It distorts the colours so much that I had to look up pictures of the kits for a more accurate representation.

    More on point: I think it's an absolute shame that nowadays, football kits are adorned with betting company for sponsors. Not much of a fan of the sleeve sponsors either.

  2. Think your both wrong with your criticism of our shirt like! Though that’s your opinion! Think Leicester kit is spot on and the best of all 20 kits, I’ll give you both that 👏🏻 👍 but the Newcastle kit is a very close 2nd… it’s 4midable

  3. As an Everton fan I can honestly say Umbro made some of our worst kits and I actually feel sorry for Brentford and burnley, also rating burnleys home kit 4th and Everton's 14th is mind blowing to me I might be a bit biased as a blue but everyone can see that Everton's kit is much better than burnleys

  4. Kits that are sponsored by betting companies should be placed right at bottom regardless of their design.
    Club owners ought to do some “soul searching” in deciding shirt sponsors. Fans should also choose other ways to support their beloved club. That would be a strong message.

  5. Arsenal home Jersey always look like that since the 90s! that tells you are not a Arsenal fan cause every Gunner fan know that..you can go back and check they not following Ajax ..do the research and u will see ..

  6. Would maybe say theres only 8 kits in this video that arent shite. Leeds looks decent (then again theyre always good and if anything this isnt the quality it usually is with kappa as their sponsor), brightons is decent, the symmetry and colours (even the nike logo). Palace got the nice gold on the sponsor and puma logo (not a massive fan of the diagnol stripes as oppose to normal stripes tho). Chelsea and leicest have tried something which u have to rate, (then again what was once "unique" patterns has now become "generic" on dark blue kits, i mean chelsea have tried patterns like that for the last 2/3 years). The only 3 id actually buy however are utd, norwich, burnley. Norwich is simple yet vibrant and its always nice for a kit thats already bright to keep it simple rather than match the madness of the colour with mad patterns…just no. And in the case where u do have a bit of madness, keeping it on the sleeve is much nicer and leaving the rest of the shirt plain and more casual (which norwich have). As a fan of claret and blue kits and someone who usually likes all 3 (villa, burnley, west ham), burnleys looks a cracker this year. Again like norwich patterned sleeve, plain rest of shirt. Also stands out above the other 2 claret and blue kits this year, given 1 is so dull (west ham) and the other has faint stripes which kind of spoils it. As for utd im a utd fan so ofc. Then again i am fine to admit when we have a bad shirt and definitely dont purchase if i dont like (cough* last seasons), and many away kits weve had over the last 5 yrs whether it be salmon pink, snake skin, last years camo snake skin 3rd kit, last years away zebra crossing. But this year im a fan of and definitely will be getting. Nice texture, gold man utd crest on the top at the back which is a nice addition. Nothing bad to say about it apart from the sponsor which thogdad pointed out. But its silly even discussing that cos when is there ever gonna not be a sponsor. Also think its silly knocking it down ur list thogdad when every other kit in the list also has a sponsor (and ur reason only being that tribute shirts shouldnt have sponsors – thats a problem with every tribute shirt then since all of them have it on, not just utd. In other words just say u dont like modern tribute shirts not just uniteds).

  7. Thogdads only reasoning for disliking the utd shirt was that it was a tribute shirt that doesnt look like the original (due to the sponsor). In other words the kit is as bad as every other in the league (given they also have sponsors), but the combination of the 2 things (tribute and sponsor) took utds down the list. Basically u mustnt even like tribute shirts in general because nearly every modern shirt that is a tribute to an old kit also has a sponsor on

  8. Right so thogdads reasoning for disliking the man utd kit is that, is because given its a tribute shirt, it should look more like the original, he says it doesnt because of the sponsor in the middle & the sponsor on the sleeve (in other words the thing every kit has on it nowadays anyway). Problem is thogdad there would be little to no chance of having no sponsor on a modern shirt anyway, so ur only solution is to simply not even make tribute shirts in the first place. If the sponsor is the only thing u dislike then it isnt the particular shirt thats the problem but tribute shirts in general. As a utd fan myself, theres nothing apart from that, to dislike (whether it be design, colour, texture). If anything its all plus points on previous kits. Firstly theres a nice gold man utd crest on the back (nothing much but still pretty cool), and the texture is very nice.

  9. 1. Southampton.
    2. Chelsea.
    4. Leicester.
    5. Crystal palace.
    6.man City.
    7. Arsenal.
    8. Burnley.
    9. Norwich City.
    10. Liverpool.
    11. Spurs.
    12. Watford
    13. Everton.
    14. West ham.
    15. Aston Villa.
    16. Leeds.
    17. man Utd.
    18. Brentford.
    19. Newcastle
    20. Wolves.

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *